Fiscal Note & Local Impact Statement
125 th General Assembly of Ohio
|
BILL: |
DATE: |
||||
|
STATUS: |
SPONSOR: |
||||
|
LOCAL IMPACT
STATEMENT REQUIRED: |
|
||||
|
STATE FUND |
FY 2005 |
FY 2006 |
FUTURE YEARS |
||
|
General Revenue Fund |
|||||
|
Revenues |
- 0 - |
- 0 - |
|||
|
Expenditures |
Potential minimal increase |
Potential minimal increase |
Potential minimal increase |
||
|
Fund 518 (Oil & Gas
Permit Fees and Oil & Gas Well Plugging) |
|||||
|
Revenues |
Potential gain |
Potential gain |
Potential gain |
||
|
Expenditures |
Increase |
Increase |
Increase |
||
Note: The state
fiscal year is July 1 through June 30.
For example, FY 2005 is July 1, 2004 – June 30, 2005.
·
As
a result of this bill, the Division of Mineral Resources Management is given
exclusive state authority to regulate oil and gas exploration and operations,
while the role of local governments is reduced. This may increase the number of permits, which would create a
potential gain in revenues in Fund 518 from the additional permitting and the
corresponding severance tax from the additional wells drilled. If this occurs, there would be a need for
more inspections, which would result in an increase in expenditures in the GRF
and Fund 518. Most of the expenditures
for this activity are in Fund 518.
However, the increased expenditures should be partially offset by the
increase in revenues.
·
The
bill adds authority for the Chief DMRM to adopt rules specifying minimum
distances that wells and other excavations, structures, and equipment must be
located from public or private recreational areas, zoning districts, and
structures other than buildings. The
bill also adds additional subjects that the rules concerning the oil and gas
law must cover. Lastly, for
applications for a permit to drill a new well, there are additional
requirements that must be met for the applicant. The Division must transfer copies of applications to appropriate
municipal corporations and townships.
These additional rules will increase expenditures from Fund 518.
|
LOCAL
GOVERNMENT |
FY 2004 |
FY 2005 |
FUTURE YEARS |
|||
|
Counties, Municipalities
and Townships |
||||||
|
Revenues |
Potential loss |
Potential loss |
Potential loss |
|||
|
Expenditures |
Potential decrease |
Potential decrease |
Potential decrease |
|||
Note: For most local governments, the fiscal year is the calendar year. The school district fiscal year is July 1 through June 30.
·
As
a result of this bill, the Division of Mineral Resources Management is given
exclusive state authority to regulate oil and gas exploration and operations,
while local governmental regulation is reduced. If this bill is enacted, local fees, if any, for oil and gas
drilling would be eliminated. Expenses
for those local entities that do not collect fees for oil and gas regulations
could be reduced.
|
|
According
to the Division of Mineral Resources Management’s (DMRM) website, Ohio has
62,902 active wells. These wells
produced six million barrels of oil and 97 billion cubic feet of natural gas in
2002. The market value for this is $466
million.
Under current law, DMRM has
a certain amount of concurrent jurisdiction with municipal corporations,
counties, and townships to regulate oil and gas well operations. A person applying for a state oil and gas
well drilling permit must include a sworn statement that the person will comply
with all local requirements related to drilling or operation of an oil or gas
well. Current law cannot prevent
municipal corporations, counties, or townships from enacting and enforcing
health and safety standards for drilling and exploration for oil and gas, as
long as those standards are not less restrictive than state law. Counties and townships, however, are
prohibited from adopting or enforcing any requirement relative to minimum
acreage requirements for drilling units, minimum setback distances for wells,
or the restoration or plugging of an oil and gas well. Counties and townships also are not to
prohibit the use of land, owned or leased by an industrial firm, to conduct oil
and gas drilling activities on the land when the oil or gas is used for the
operation of the firm.
This
bill repeals all provisions of law that grant or allude to the authority of
local governments to adopt requirements concerning oil and gas operations. The DMRM would have sole and exclusive
authority of regulating the permitting, location, and spacing of oil and gas
wells within the state. The regulation
of oil and gas requires statewide regulation and the Oil and Gas Law and rules
adopted under it constitute a comprehensive plan with respect to all aspects of
oil and gas operations.
Currently, permits to drill
are $250 and plugging permits are $50.
In 2002, DMRM issued 681 permits to drill and 807 permits to plug. The DMRM also performed over 10,602 site
inspections. If the regulation of oil
and gas operations is more uniform statewide and local regulations are reduced,
there could be an increase in the number of permits issued. This would increase the revenues to Fund 518
from the increased permitting and the corresponding severance tax from the additional
wells drilled. However, a greater
number of permits issued would increase the number of inspections
required. It might also increase the
time needed for permit review and issuance.
As a result, expenditures could also increase. While the Department Natural Resources (DNR) does not have an
estimate regarding the total increase in revenues and expenditures, it is
likely that the fees collected would balance out the increased expenditures.
Local governmental
regulation of oil and gas operations seems to differ from agency to
agency. Three counties were called and
surveyed about their oil and gas regulations.
Neither Huron nor Tuscarawas counties regulate oil and gas
operations. Summit County stated that
there were setback regulations for oil and gas wells, but there were no permits
issued or inspections performed. Bath
Township in Summit County stated that they have regulations regarding oil and
gas operations. The Township Board of
Zoning is able to make recommendations regarding drilling and could also send
zoning inspectors to the drilling site to determine if these recommendations
have been followed. However, Bath
Township does not collect any fees for this.
The Department of Natural
Resources stated that some local governments have fees applied to the review of
proposed oil and gas wells and fees on existing wells. These fees are used to compensate zoning
inspectors for their time relating to oil and gas issues. As a result, those local governments that do
not regulate oil and gas would be unaffected.
Government expenses for those local entities that do not collect fees
for oil and gas regulations could be reduced.
Lastly, there could be an offsetting effect for those local entities
that collect fees since they will no longer have to pay zoning inspectors for
their time on matters relating to oil and gas regulations. The fiscal effect for each local government
will differ depending on the scope of their oil and gas regulation and whether
or not they collect fees for this.
Under
current law, the Chief of DMRM may specify minimum distances that wells and
other excavations, structures, and equipment must be located from water wells,
streets, roads, highways, rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, other bodies of water,
railroad tracks, and buildings. The
bill adds authority for the Chief to adopt rules specifying minimum distances
that wells and other excavations, structures, and equipment must be located
from public or private recreational areas, zoning districts, and structures
other than buildings.
These
additional rules could increase expenditures from Fund 518. The DNR stated that the majority of
information needed if these new rules are enacted can be provided with the
registered survey that is required with an application. If on-site permit and additional post permit
issuance reviews are needed, personnel costs could be higher.
Rules and Permits for Oil and Gas Law
The
Chief of the Division of Mineral Resources Management shall adopt, rescind, and
amend, rules for the administration, implementation, and enforcement dealing
with oil and gas law. This bill
requires that the rules include an identification of the subjects that the
Chief shall address when attaching terms and conditions to a permit with
respect to a well and production facilities of a well that are located within a
municipal corporation or within a township that has a population of more than
15,000. The subjects shall include:
·
Safety
concerning the drilling or operation of a well;
·
Protection
of the public and private water supply;
·
Location
of surface facilities of a well;
·
Fencing
and screening of surface facilities of a well;
·
Containment
and disposal of drilling and production wastes;
·
Construction
of access roads for purposes of the drilling and operation of a well.
This could increase expenditures to the Division.
Permits for Wells
An application for a permit
to drill a new well, drill an existing well deeper, reopen a well, convert a
well or plug back a well shall be filed with the Chief of the Division of
Mineral Resources Management and shall contain such things as name and address
of owner, location of tract, designation of the well by name and number, and
type of drilling equipment to be used to name a few. This bill eliminates the requirement concerning a sworn statement
that all requirements of any municipal corporation, county, or township be met
for any application filing with the Division of Mineral Resources
Management. The bill adds requirements
for an application for a permit to drill a new well. The new requirement is that a sworn statement that the applicant
has provided notice of the application to the owner of each occupied dwelling
unit that is located within 500 feet of the surface location of the well if the
surface location will be less than 500 feet from the boundary of the drilling
unit and more than15 occupied dwelling units are located less than 500 feet
from the surface location of the well.
The notice shall contain a statement that an application has been filed,
identify the name of the applicant and the proposed well location, and contain
a statement that comments regarding the application may be sent to the Division
(the Division’s address shall also be provided). The notice may be delivered by hand or regular mail. The identity of the owners of occupied
dwelling units shall be determined using the tax records of the municipal
corporation or county in which the dwelling unit is located as of the date of
the notice.
The
bill also requires that the Chief shall transfer a copy (facsimile or if
unavailable, by regular mail) of a drilling permit application to the clerk of
the municipal corporation or township in which the well or proposed well is to
be located. This transfer is to be done
if the municipal corporation or township has a population of greater than
15,000 or has requested a copy.
The
additional requirements concerning new permits to drill could increase
expenditures to the Division. Staff
will have to process and review this additional information. Also, copies of these permits must be faxed
or mailed to municipal corporations or townships. This will also increase expenditures to the Division.
Oil and Gas Marketing Program
Under current law, if an
independent producer requests the end of a marketing program, all operations of
the program shall be terminated and remaining unobligated moneys shall be
returned to the independent producers who paid assessments. This bill adds that if a program is operated
by a nonprofit corporation that is exempt from federal income taxes, the
nonprofit corporation shall distribute any remaining unobligated money to be
used for exempt purposes or for a public purpose. If there remains any unobligated money after the distribution by
the nonprofit corporation, the court of common pleas of the county in which the
principal office of the corporation is located shall distribute the remaining
unobligated money for purposes exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code.
LSC fiscal
staff: Wendy Risner,
Budget Analyst