Fiscal Note & Local Impact Statement

126 th General Assembly of Ohio

Ohio Legislative Service Commission

77 South High Street, 9th Floor, Columbus, OH 43215-6136 ² Phone: (614) 466-3615

² Internet Web Site: http://www.lsc.state.oh.us/

BILL:

H.B. 609

DATE:

November 28, 2006

STATUS:

As Introduced

SPONSOR:

Rep. McGregor

LOCAL IMPACT STATEMENT REQUIRED:

No —

Possible indirect local effects

 


CONTENTS:

To establish the Commercial Fishing Buy-Out Program and to make an appropriation

 

State Fiscal Highlights

 

STATE FUND

FY 2007

FY 2008

FUTURE YEARS

General Revenue Fund

     Revenues

- 0 -

- 0 -

- 0 -

     Expenditures

Increase of $4 million

- 0 -

- 0 -

Wildlife Fund (Fund 015)

     Revenues

- 0 -

- 0 -

- 0 -

     Expenditures

Potential one-time savings of $380,000, more or less

- 0 -

- 0 -

Note:  The state fiscal year is July 1 through June 30.  For example, FY 2007 is July 1, 2006 – June 30, 2007.

 

·        New GRF appropriation to buy back commercial fishing licenses.  The bill adds a new GRF line item, 725-503, Commercial Fishing Buy-Out Program, in the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and appropriates $4 million to it in FY 2007.  The $4 million will be used by the Division of Wildlife to provide compensation to the commercial fishing industry.  This amount equals approximately one year of gross revenue to commercial fishing license holders.

·        Savings to the Division of Wildlife.  Since the bill requires the commercial fishing industry in Ohio to cease prior to the 2007 commercial fishing season, the Division of Wildlife may experience savings in the Wildlife Fund (Fund 015) from management and enforcement costs related to commercial fishing industry.  These savings will result after accounting for the Department's total annual costs for management and enforcement less annual commercial fishing license fees and royalties.  These savings are estimated to be $380,000 when the ban takes effect. 

Local Fiscal Highlights

 

·        No direct fiscal effect on political subdivisions.



 

 

Detailed Fiscal Analysis

 

The bill

 

The bill amends two sections of Am. Sub. H.B. 66 (biennial operating budget for FYs 2006-2007, Sections 209.18 and 209.18.09) to create the Commercial Fishing Buy-Out Program and to make a GRF appropriation of $4 million for FY 2007 to fund it.  Under the program the Division of Wildlife in the Department of Natural Resources must acquire all commercial fishing licenses currently issued and in reserve, including the rights to renew such licenses.  The Division must use the appropriated money to buy back the licenses and renewal rights from the licensees as soon as practicable after the bill's effective date.  The bill provides formulas to determine the amount paid to each licensee for yellow perch and all other species.  Under the buy-out program all commercial fishing must cease prior to the 2007 season.  The commercial fishing season is generally from March 1 to December 10 of each year.

 

Details of the buy-out

 

The $4 million GRF appropriation will be used to give each licensee about one year of gross revenue based on the value of the commercial harvest in Ohio over the last six years.  The DNR reports that this buy-out will affect roughly 40 commercial fishing licensees, primarily for trap net and seine license holders.

 

The amount paid to each licensee is based on formulas in the bill which multiply the average number of pounds per year of fish caught (either yellow perch or other species) times a specific price per pound ($1.94 per pound for yellow perch and $.28 per pound for all other species).  For both calculations the average is to be determined by dividing by six the total of six years of largest reported catch during the 2000-2005 calendar year period.  Each person holding a license is to be paid at least $100.  DNR reports that this formula is similar to the formula used for the gillnet buy-out program in 1984.

 

DNR reports that the estimated dockside value of the commercial harvest from Lake Erie in calendar year (CY) 2005 was $4.1 million.  Over the past ten years, the estimated value has ranged from a low of $2.2 million in CY 1998 to a high of $4.2 million in CY 2005, with an average value of approximately $3 million. 

 

State fiscal effects of the bill

 

Department of Natural Resources.  DNR incurs annual costs of approximately $250,000 to enforce the commercial fishing law and incurs costs of approximately $150,000 for commercial fishing population and harvest assessment.  In total, the Division of Wildlife incurs costs ranging between $400,000 - $500,000 per fiscal year to manage the commercial industry. These enforcement and management costs are paid from the state Wildlife Fund (Fund 015).

 

Also, as part of the buy-out the Division of Wildlife would presumably lose the annual revenue generated from commercial fishing licenses and commercial fishing royalties.  In FY 2005, DNR collected $28,700 in commercial fishing license fees and $90,669 in commercial fishing royalties.  In total, the Wildlife Fund (Fund 015) receives approximately $120,000 in commercial fishing license fees and royalties.

 

Taking into account both DNR's current expenditures and current revenues related to the commercial fishing industry, if commercial fishing ceases prior to the 2007 season the Wildlife Fund (Fund 015) may experience savings in the range of $380,000 once the ban is in place.  It is unknown where and how these savings will be distributed within the Department's budget and which programs will be affected.

 

Indirect fiscal effects

 

Based on the highly speculative nature of whether the state and/or local governments may experience an increase or decrease in sales and income tax revenue as a result of the bill (particularly as it relates to either jobs, fish price adjustments, state enforcement and management costs, sport fishing, local tourism, local business, etc.) LSC cannot accurately predict how such potential indirect fiscal effects could impact the state and/or local governments.

 

 

LSC fiscal staff:  Jonathan Lee, Senior Budget Analyst

 

HB0609IN.doc/lb